Blogcabin California

January 18, 2008

What Do You Think of This?

Posted by James at 4:24 pm .
Filed under: Miscellany

Bob Fraas sent this item below to me and suggested I get it out to the community for your thoughts on how to fix the state’s deficit. Be sure to contact Arnold and tell him.  He can be reached through his web site at http://gov.ca.gov

A Message From Governor Schwarzenegger 

As you know, the state is facing a tough budget situation. Yesterday I presented a budget plan that includes 10 percent across the board reductions because we are facing a $14 billion deficit. The problem is not one of revenue, it is one of spending.

While revenues are flat, automatic formulas are increasing spending by 7.3 percent.  Even a booming economy can’t meet that kind of increase. Tax increases are not the solution to this problem, fundamental reform to California’s budget process is.

California has long had a dysfunctional budget structure. It is an issue I have tried to address several times in the past. The first year I was in office, I tried to fix the system.  I tried to get the Legislators to pass a Constitutional amendment to limit spending, but it didn’t pass.  Then in 2005, I tried to convince the voters to pass a Constitutional amendment to control the budget, but that failed too. 

The good news is that with tough times also come historic opportunities. In my State of the State Address this week I proposed a Constitutional amendment called the Budget Stabilization Act which will make sure our spending is tied to our revenues. It would trigger lower funding levels if deficit opens up during the year. It will not let us spend all of that money that rushes in when the economy is good. Instead, we would set some of that good year money aside for bad years. 

I need your help to solve this problem and to bring stability and predictability to California’s budget system - without increasing taxes. Together we will bring lasting change to our state.

Take a few moments to send a letter to your legislators today, ask them to support my plan to bring stability back to California’s budget process!

Thank you for your support.

January 17, 2008

11th Log Cabin Member Appointed by Governor Schwarzenegger

Posted by James at 10:34 pm .
Filed under: Miscellany

Peter_Hankwitz_96dpi_192x264.jpgLog Cabin announced that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed Peter Hankwitz, 39, of Northridge, has been appointed to the Student Aid Commission. He founded Peter Hankwitz Production & Management in 2000 and currently serves as executive producer. Hankwitz previously was client manager and co-founder of Starbar Entertainment Incorporated from 1999 to 2000 and held the same positions for Reburn & Hankwitz Creative Agency from 1993 to 1996. He also served as a talent manager for Michael McLean & Associates from 1988 to 1993 and held the same position from 1996 to 1998. Hankwitz served as a casting coordinator for Diane Dimeo Casting from 1988 to 1991. Additionally, he has been a guest lecturer on management and communications since 2001 and has lectured for the Los Angeles Unified School District, University of Southern California and Pepperdine University. Hankwitz is a co-founder of the Robert Urich Foundation for Cancer Research and Patient Care and is a past community advocate for the Yucca Corridor Gang Abatement Project in Los Angeles. He is a member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation and The Next Generation Council of the Motion Picture & Television Fund. This position requires Senate confirmation and the compensation is $100 per diem.   

“Governor Schwarzenegger has appointed 11 people from the Log Cabin bench and we have more candidates under consideration,” said James Vaughn, Director of California Log Cabin Republicans. “We are proud to be serving the state in such a diverse fashion. We have a great relationship with the Governor and we’re glad he calls on us to help diversify his administration” 

Log Cabin is focusing its efforts on recruiting LGBT Republicans for appointment to positions of influence and public service at the state and local level.   Governor Schwarzenegger has appointed over twenty LGBT staff, board, commission and other staff political appointees.  Besides Hankwitz; other current serving openly gay State Commission and Board appointees include; Alex Calero (California Psychiatry Board),  James Vaughn (State Bar Board of Governor’s Examining Committee),  Alan Howard (California Osteopathic Medical Board), Don Norte (Governor’s Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities), Andrew Poat (California Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission), Leonard Olds (California Council for the Humanities), Jon Stordahl (Commission on Teacher Credentialing); Greg Gandrud (Recreational Trails Committee); and Rory Diamond (Student Aid Commission) as well as Tod Burnett (Vice Chancellor, California Community Colleges) among other political staff appointees.   

Foiled Again

Posted by James at 10:34 pm .
Filed under: Miscellany

RELIGIOUS RIGHT FOILED AGAIN 

Capitol Resource Family Impact failed to secure the number of signatures necessary to put a repeal of SB 777 on the ballot. This bill reiterated protections for students in the classroom that already existed in law. Opponents claim it would lead to the repeal of the terms “Mom” and “Dad” in the classroom.  Another attempt will be made to repeal that law through a ballot initiative instead. But like the multiple failed attempts to get a marriage amendment on the ballot, this too seems to accomplish only the actual goal – to raise money for Capitol Resource Family Impact. 

AND AGAIN 

The California Supreme Court denied a petition by county assessors seeking to overturn basic property tax protections for domestic partners – excluding domestic partners from property tax reassessment after the death of a partner.  That’s the same Prop 13 protection that married couples enjoy. The Court’s decision means that the validity of these protections is now secure. No further appeals are possible.  When will they just give up and go home? 

 

AND AGAIN 

Three measures to ban marriage, including one to overturn domestic partnerships failed December 27th. There are four more measures out in circulation including one due January 28th

The other three have until the end of April and May.  Good news, but we still keep a close eye on things.

 

 

January 15, 2008

LCRCA-PAC & Governor Disagree on Prop. 93 [Here is his opinion on the issue]

Posted by Kevin Norte at 12:30 pm .
Filed under: California Politics

Reform term limits

He backs Prop. 93, the governor says, because it will improve government.
By Arnold Schwarzenegger
January 15, 2008
I have long advocated reform in Sacramento, and I am proud of what has been accomplished since I took office in 2003. Now we need to take other important steps to make state government even more responsive to the people we serve.

We need redistricting reform to make the political system more competitive and more representative of the citizens of California. We need campaign finance reform to limit the influence of money in politics, and it is time to reform legislative term limits.

Term limits have been on the books since 1990, and I strongly support the idea of restricting the number of years politicians can spend in office. Elected officials who serve for decades lose a sense of urgency to make things better, and they often fall out of touch with the public. But we went too far and need to make some important refinements, as we do all the time with legislation that needs to be corrected, because the people are not well served by the current system.

In fact, the current system of term limits — which allows members of the Senate to serve two terms (eight years) and members of the Assembly three terms (six years), with a total maximum of 14 years — is contributing to Sacramento’s problems rather than fixing them. I am endorsing Proposition 93, which would lower the total number of years a member could serve to 12, but also allows him or her to divide them between the houses as they choose. I am convinced that this would result in the people of California getting a more experienced, more independent Legislature.

It takes time to learn how to govern effectively. Under the current system, our elected officials are not given the time they need to reach their full potential as public servants. Just as they get seasoned in one house, they know their time is beginning to run out, and they must start positioning themselves to run for a new office.

Imagine what would happen if we told a big-city police chief or a sheriff he could stay in the job just long enough to start mastering it and then had to move on. Or if we told teachers they had to switch careers just as they started to accumulate enough experience and wisdom to really connect with their students.

Just look at the issues we are working on in Sacramento right now. We are debating the best way to make sure we never run out of water. How to reform one of the world’s largest prison systems. How to fix a broken healthcare system in California that consumes more than $200 billion a year. How to fix our schools. Our budget system. How to rebuild California’s aging infrastructure.

These are extraordinarily complex issues that have overwhelmed this state for decades. The people of California are not well served by so much turnover and the lack of expertise in the Legislature.

Our legislators should be given an opportunity to become outstanding at their jobs. To become policy experts who can make the kind of informed and forward-thinking decisions this state desperately needs.

The current term-limits law has created another unintended consequence that also must be fixed. It has ceded too much power to the special interests in Sacramento, because the unions, corporations and lobbyists take advantage of the relentless campaign cycle faced by legislators forced to seek a new position. Your representatives become more concerned with campaign cash, endorsements and independent expenditures than public policy. So they operate in fear of alienating the special interests they must constantly rely on for campaign money. Former Republican leader Jim Brulte had the right idea when he said he was endorsing Proposition 93 because it will give legislators the confidence to say “no” to special interests.

The constant jockeying for new positions also makes legislators more dependent on their political party and its most extreme elements. Allowing members to serve more time in the Assembly or Senate will help bring more civility and less partisanship to Sacramento.

When Proposition 93 was first introduced, I said I would not support it without a companion redistricting measure. Though some progress was made last year on that issue, we have not been able to agree on a redistricting measure in the Legislature; I’m supporting a proposal that was drafted by reform allies including AARP, Common Cause and the League of Women Voters. But Proposition 93 is good public policy irrespective of redistricting, and on its own, it will go a long way toward improving the quality of state government in California.

The reform of term limits — along with campaign financing and redistricting — will create fundamental and positive change in Sacramento. The Legislature will be more representative of the people and less beholden to special interests. Its members will have more time to do their jobs well and, most important of all, problem-solving will be a higher priority than partisanship and ambition.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is the governor of California.

January 14, 2008

A Telling Documentary

Posted by Mark Martin at 2:27 pm .
Filed under: Miscellany

I recently had the privilege of attending a screening of a very intelligent and informative documentary entitled “For the Bible Tells Me So,” which was hosted by Christ Chapel in North Hollywood, California. It was the second consecutive night of screenings of the video and I understand that both screenings played to a packed house like it was on Sunday night. It is understandably so… for this film tells it like it is with no holds barred. Written by Daniel G. Karslake & Helen R. Mendoza and Directed by Daniel G. Karslake, “For the Bible Tells Me So” is an honest and provocative exposé of how literalist religious leaders and their unquestioning, sometimes mindless followers have taken scripture out of the context of history and how they twisted their intent into hatred, bigotry, prejudice and violence.

All of the stories told in the film; and especially one tragic case that ended in suicide, demonstrate how forcing people into a closet often has devastating consequences for all concerned. Moreover, this video also demonstrates the fact that many more people; within the Christian faith at least, are beginning to realize that fundamentalist ideology has nothing to do with the original intent of the kindness, love and compassion that was taught by Jesus.

The documentary’s official website asks clear cut questions: Can the love between two people ever be an abomination? Is the chasm separating gays, lesbians and Christianity too wide to cross? Is the Bible an excuse to hate? In this year of the Presidential elections, these questions are very pertinent to some of the consequential activities that can be found in right wing politics, not only within Christianity in America, but in those religions around the world where radical fundamentalism has created hell on earth through senseless wars and killings.

The video features interviews with such diverse people as Gay Episcopalian Bishop Gene Robinson, whose election to his theological office has stirred a lot of controversy within the Episcopalian faith; along with Bishop Desmond Tutu, Harvard’s Peter Gomes; Rev. Dr. Mel White who was a former associate of Jerry Falwell, but who came out when he was installed as Dean at the Cathedral of Hope of the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches; Orthodox Rabbi Steven Greenberg, Reverend Jimmy Creech and Former Democratic House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt, whose daughter, Chrissy, is openly gay. (Admittedly, this last individual was a little difficult for me to fathom, personally, since it was Gephardt’s hard-line bullying; his almost Soviet-like tactics that prompted me to make the decision to leave the Democratic Party, but I had to put my own feelings about the man aside. I couldn’t help thinking that Vice President Dick Chaney could have been a part of this documentary in respect to his Lesbian daughter.)

The stories of several LGBT people are explored in this video; the most poignant of which was, for me at least, the story of a woman who blindly followed the edicts of her fundamentalist minister to chastise her daughter who eventually committed suicide. The bereaved mother now supports members of the LGBT community against the hatred and prejudicial machinations of fundamentalism; something she cannot ever do for her late daughter, but it is something which she can do today to save other people of the LGBT community from theologically inspired hatred.

One very important fact is brought out in this film which many people are unaware of. Members of the LGBT community may be the primary scapegoats of religious hatred; but in effect, what is done to members of the LGBT community often extends to people of color and people of other religions. And it doesn’t stop there. Look at how much violence is occurring in the world today because of religion… and I might add, which is being perpetrated by members of the heterosexual communities against each other.

This is a very important documentary for everyone to see; especially in this election year, since it not only poses the obvious questions listed above, but it also provides some food for thought which I hope the Religious Right-wing might wish to ponder. Are your spiritual leaders representing the kindness, compassion and love of Jesus, or are they fostering hatred and violence in His name? Do the actions of your followers promote peace and understanding, or do your words and actions encourage the dark side of humanity to hold sway over what should be intelligent, thinking individuals? Is your faith attracting more people, or are your thoughts and actions forcing people to react with disgust and fall away from religion altogether, thereby enabling the growing atheistic factions within this country to become even more powerful over our lives? Yes, indeed, this documentary will give you something to think about! Hopefully, it will enable us all to take more responsibility for what is happening in America and around the world.

For more information about “For the Bible Tells Me So,” you may access the film’s website: www.forthebibletellsmeso.org/

January 12, 2008

Contrasting Huckabee’s and Giuliani’s “Sin” Remarks

Posted by Terry at 8:58 am .
Filed under: National Politics, Gay Rights

Timothy Kincaid writes a good article about the difference between “sin” and “sinful”.  I doubt that “The Huck” considers himself sinful, therefore, he is free to label others with this category, including gays and lesbians… 

 

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee made some remarks about the sinfulness of homosexuality on Meet the Press on December 30. Some have found them similar to those made by Rudy Giuliani on December 9. (Transcripts below)

At a first glance it would appear that both candidates agree: homosexual acts are sinful. And all people sin.

But a closer look may illustrate why these two people, Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani, are saying very different things. And to understand the difference we have to look at difference between “sin” and “sinful”.

Read the entire article here: http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/03/1219

January 10, 2008

Soldier: Policy on Gays May Be Shifting

Posted by Mark Martin at 12:29 pm .
Filed under: Gay Rights

This item broke yesterday on the Internet:

Soldier: Policy on Gays May  Be Shifting – by Suzanne Gamboa, Associated Press Writer  - Wed Jan 9, 4:03AM EST


WASHINGTON - Even if no one is asking, Army Sgt. Darren Manzella has been telling anyone who’ll listen that he’s gay — without serious retribution so far from the military. Manzella, a medic who served in Iraq and Kuwait, has acknowledged his sexual orientation in national media interviews and again on Tuesday in a Washington news conference.


“This is who I am. This is my life,” said Manzella, who received a combat medical badge for his service in Iraq. “It has never affected my job performance before. I don’t think it will make a difference now. And to be honest since then, I don’t see a difference because of my homosexuality.”


Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said Manzella’s case demonstrates the military is arbitrarily enforcing its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy now that the country is at war.


The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy prohibits active-duty service members from openly acknowledging whether they are gay or lesbian.


Manzella still could be investigated now that he has left the battlefield. Every time he has said he is gay publicly can be counted as a violation of the policy, one of his attorneys said.


Manzella first told a military supervisor about his sexual orientation in August 2006 while he was stationed at Fort Hood, Texas, and working in division headquarters. Three weeks after Manzella made the revelation, his battalion commander told him an investigation had been closed without finding “proof of homosexuality.”


A month later, Manzella was redeployed for the war in Iraq.


Paul Boyce Jr., an Army spokesman, said he was unaware of an investigation of Manzella being opened or closed. He said the investigation would have been done by Manzella’s Fort Hood unit, and officials there are on leave and unavailable to discuss the case.


“This particular soldier’s unit only recently returned from the war to Fort Hood, Texas, so it’s premature to speculate on any future actions until the young man’s situation can be considered by his chain of command,” Boyce said in a statement.


Manzella, originally from Portland, N.Y., returned from the Middle East last month and went on leave shortly before Christmas. He will return to the 1st Cavalry Division at Ford Hood at the end of the month.


A bill to eliminate the military’s sexual orientation policy, filed by Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., is pending in Congress. Sarvis said the bill is unlikely to get out of committee during this election year, but hearings could be held.


Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, said Manzella’s commanders should have discharged him when they learned he was gay. Her group opposes allowing gays to join the military.
 

January 8, 2008

Endorsements - Log Cabin PAC

Posted by Terry at 7:30 pm .
Filed under: Republican Party, California Politics

 

Propositions
 

Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
Proposition 91

1182. (SA2005RF0123) 

Transportation Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

Proponent: James Earp, c/o Richard D. Martland (916) 446-6752
Prohibits retention of funds earmarked for the Transportation Investment Fund in the General Fund for use unrelated to transportation after 7/1/08. Requires repayment by 6/30/17 of transportation funds retained in the General Fund in years prior to 2007-08. Eliminates General Fund borrowing of specified transportation funds, except for cash-flow purposes (repayment required within 30 days of adoption of budget); current law allows borrowing for three years where Governor declares transfer would cause significant negative fiscal impact on governmental functions and Legislature enacts authorizing statute. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: No revenue or cost effects. Increases stability of funding to transportation in 2007-08 and thereafter; reduces somewhat the state’s flexibility to use specified transportation funds for other (nontransportation) activities. (SA2005RF0123) (Full Text)
LCRCAPAC POSITION: OPPOSE

Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
Proposition 92

1226. (06-0030) 

Community Colleges. Funding. Governance. Fees. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

Proponents: Dennis Smith and Scott Lay c/o Eugene Hill (916) 442-2952
Establishes in state constitution a system of independent public community college districts and Board of Governors. Generally, requires minimum levels of state funding for school districts and community college districts to be calculated separately, using different criteria and separately appropriated. Allocates 10.46 percent of current Proposition 98 school funding maintenance factor to community colleges. Sets community college fees at $15/unit per semester; limits future fee increases. Provides formula for allocation by Legislature to community college districts that would not otherwise receive general fund revenues through community college apportionment. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Potential increases in state spending on K-14 education of about $135 million in 2007-08, $275 million in 2008-09, and $470 million in 2009-2010, with unknown impact annually thereafter. Annual loss of fee revenues to community colleges of about $71 million in 2007-08, with unknown impacts annually thereafter. (06-0030.) (Full Text)
LCRCAPAC POSITION: OPPOSE

Initiative Constitutional Amendment
Proposition 93

1238. (07-0004, Amdt. #1S) 

Limits on Legislators’ Terms in Office. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

Proponents: Robin B. Johansen and Kari Krogseng c/o James C. Harrison (510) 346-6200
Reduces the total amount of time a person may serve in the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years. Allows a person to serve a total of 12 years either in the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both. Provides a transition period to allow current members to serve a total of 12 consecutive years in the house in which they are currently serving, regardless of any prior service in another house. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would have no direct fiscal effect on state or local governments. (07-0004.) (Full Text)
LCRCAPAC POSITION: OPPOSE