Blogcabin California

October 24, 2007

Mit The Flip Flopper-More Questions Being Raised and Not Answered

Posted by Kevin Norte at 8:00 am .
Filed under: National Politics

Flip Flop Mitt - Still on the Defensive


Mitt Romney seen here demonstrating his two positions on an issue.

Governor Mitt Romney still can’t explain his double talk on Ronald Reagan.  On Sunday, Bob Schieffer from CBS News interviewed him on “Face the Nation.”  Schieffer asked Romney to explain why he ran away from Ronald Reagan during his 1994 Senate campaign.  This is the best Romney could come up with - “When I was running in ‘94, I wasn’t trying to return to Reagan-Bush, because that was characterized as a very different posture than what I was running for.”  What?!? 

Watch here as he crafts implausible answers to Schieffer’s questions.  His tangled responses demonstrate, once again, that you just can’t trust Mitt Romney

Then Sunday night at the Fox News Republican Presidential Debate in Florida, Mitt found out that his opponents are on to him too!  Senator John McCain said, “Governor Romney, you’ve been spending the last year trying to fool people about your record. I don’t want you to start fooling them about mine.”  Senator McCain knows that you can’t trust Mitt Romney.

It was more bad news for Team Romney in Washington, DC on Friday and Saturday.  Romney spoke at the Family Research Council’s “Values Voters Summit” and participated in their straw poll.  Romney targeted this event to gain support from social conservatives.  Log Cabin staff members attended the “summit” to talk with participants, reporters, and talk radio hosts about Mitt Romney’s record.  Romney received only 10% support from conference attendees…only 99 straw poll votes.  Apparently, “Values Voter Summit” attendees know you can’t trust Mitt Romney.

Please help Log Cabin educate more Republicans about Mitt Romney’s record.

  Contribute today!

Since Log Cabin launched its television ad campaign, Mitt Romney has been dropping in Iowa polls.  It looks like Iowa Republicans are starting to realize what we already know, that you just can’t trust Mitt Romney.

Click here to view Log Cabin’s ad.

 

Log Cabin’s ad continues to garner attention from the national news media.  Deb Price, from the Detroit News, calls Log Cabin’s ad ”audacious.”  Click here to read her column.

Click here to contribute to our effort.

Paid for by Log Cabin RepublicansNot authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.  LCR, Inc. is a 501(c)4 organization.  Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.  There is no limit on contribution amount.  Donor information and contributions are not publicly reported. 

October 12, 2007

California Same Gender Marriage Bill, A.B. 43 Vetoed

Posted by Kevin Norte at 6:37 pm .
Filed under: Gay Rights, California Politics

To the Member of the California State Assembly

I am returning Assembly Bill 43 without my signature.

As I stated in vetoing similar legislation in 2005, I am proud California is a leader in recognizing and respecting domestic partnerships.  I believe that all Californians are entitled to full protection under the law and should not be discriminated against based upon sexual orientation.  I support current domestic partnership rights and will continue to vigorously defend and enforce these rights.

In 2000, voters approved Proposition 22, a challenge to which is currently pending before the California Supreme Court.  I maintain my position that the appropriate resolution is to allow the Court to rule on Proposition 22.  The people of California should then determine  what, if any, statutory changes are needed in response to the Court’s ruling.

Sincerely,

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Well, as a research attorney and not as a gay man, I legally understand the Governor’s position.  Emotionally, I am, . . well. . ., emotions should not rule law.  D&%$ It!  I logically understand it.  The Supreme Court of California had even asked for further briefing on the specific issue of Proposition 22.  The Court ultimately interprets the law and not the legislative nor executive branches.

And with that in mind, I will respectfully wait for the Supreme Court of California, in California, my home, to rule whether I can legally marry my high school sweetheart.  And when it does, I carry the hope within me that I will be getting married because as a research attorney in the largest Court system in the world, I know what the problems are with Proposition 22.  Simply put, it was passed with emotions running high but the wording, in my own opinion, fails, and it also violates the rights and gays and lesbians the right to petition the legislature to secure the right to marry.  I believe that right to petition will be restored to us someday and when it is, well, you will read about it.

October 11, 2007

For Those In Power Who Need A History Lesson

Posted by Kevin Norte at 8:42 pm .
Filed under: National Politics, California Politics

The Veteran’s Property was deeded expressly for the use by disabled Veterans and it is just too bad that others want to use it for other uses.  We must support our troops and when they get home equally support them and not treat them with the disrespect our county showed veterans after Vietnam.

Here is the DEED.  It says everything.

This Indenture made the third day of March one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight, By and Between John P. Jones and Arcadia B. de Baker, the parties of the first part and the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, a corporation, formed and now existing under the laws of the United States, the party of the second part,
            Witnesseth:  that whereas by an act of Congress approved March  2nd 1887 to provide the location and erection of a branch home for disabled volunteer soldiers West of the Rocky Mountains, the Board of Managers of the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers were authorized, empowered, and directed to locate, establish, construct and empowered, and direct to locate, establish, construct and permanently maintain a branch of said National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, to be by such Board, located at such place in the States West of the Rocky Mountains as to said Board should appear most desirable and advantageous.
[COMMENT-THE GRANTORS DONATED THE PROPERTY IN CONSIDERATION THAT THE PROPERTY WAS TO USED PERMANENTLY AS A PLACE FOR DISABLED VETERANS]
And whereas, the parties hereto of the first part in consideration that the party hereto of the second part should locate, establish, construct and permanently maintain a branch of said National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers on a site to be selected by its Board of Managers along the dividing line between the Ranchos San Jose de Buenos Ayres and San Vicente y Santa Monica offered to donate to the said party of the second part, three hundred acres of land, being a portion of said Rancho San Vicente y Santa Monica belonging to them, the said parties of the first part, on which to locate, establish, construct and permanently maintain  [emphasis added] such branch of said National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers..
            And Whereas the Board of Managers of said National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, in consideration of said offer have selected the land and premises hereinafter described for the purpose aforesaid, and have notified the parties of the first part of such selection.
Now, Therefore, in consideration [emphasis added] of the premises and of the location, establishment, construction and permanent maintenance  [emphasis added] of a branch of said National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers on such tract of and, so selected, and of the benefits to accrue to the said parties of the first part, owners of the said Rancho San Vicente y Santa Monica, presents do give and grant unto the said party of the second part, all the following described land and premises, situate, lying and being in the County of Los Angeles, State of California and particularly bounded and described as follows:
            Commencing at a point on the boundary line between the Ranchos San Vicente y Santa Monica and San Jose de Buenos Ayres distant 6044 feet Northerly from the corner post on the line between  the said Rancho San Vicente y Santa Monica and the Rancho La Ballona, which post is the common corner of the Rancho San Vicente y Santa Monica and Rancho San Jose de Buenos Ayres running from said point of beginning South 54-1/2 East 2780-2/10 feet to a state on the boundary line between the said ranchos San Vicente y Santa Monica and San Jose de Buenos Ayres, thence South 35-1/2 East along said boundary line 4385 feet to the place of beginning containing three hundred (300) Acres of land;
[COMMENT-THE GRANTORS CLEARLY GIFTED THE LAND IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOREVER FOR THE PURPOSE OF A VETERAN’S HOME ON THAT PARTICUALR LAND AS THE FOLLOW PARAGRAPH STATES]
Together with all and singular the tenements, hereditamenents and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to have and to hold the said land  [emphasis added] and premises, with appurtenances, unto the said party of the second part forever, [emphasis added] for the purpose of such branch Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers to be thereon so located, established, constructed and permanently maintained. [emphasis added]
            In Witness Whereof the said parties of the first part have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year above written
                                                John P. Jones   (seal)
                                    By his attorney in fact, Walter Van Dyke (seal)
                                                Arcadia B. de Baker (seal)
                                    By her attorney in fact, Robert S. Baker
State of California       )
                                     )
County of Los Angeles )  ss.
                                     )        On this 5th day of March in the year one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight before me, Charles Worth, a Notary Pubic in and for said Los Angeles County residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Walter Van Dyke known to me to be the person described in and whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney in fact of John P. Jones and the said Walter Van Dyke acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of John P. Jones thereunto as principal and his own name as Attorney in fact.
            In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal at my office in the City and County of Los Angeles the day and year in this Certificate first above written.
(Notarial Seal)                                      Charles Worth
                                                            Notary Public
State of California       )
                                     )
County of Los Angeles )  ss.
                                     )        On this 5th day of March in the year one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight before me, Charles Worth, a Notary Pubic in and for said Los Angeles County residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Walter Van Dyke known to me to be the person described in and whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney in fact of John P. Jones and the said Robert S. Baker, known to me to be the person described in, and whose name subscribed to the within instrument, as the Attorney in fact of Arcadia B. de baker, and the said Robert S. Baker acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of Arcadia B. de Baker thereunto as principal and his own name as Attorney in fact..
            In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal at my office in the City and County of Los Angeles the day and year in this Certificate first above written.
(Notarial Seal)                                      Charles Worth
                                                            Notary Public
A full, true and correct copy of the original recorded at request of Grantee march 10, 1888 at 17 min. past 12 N.
                                                            Frank A. Gibson, County Recorder
                                                            By Frank H. While, Deputy

Supporting Our Veterans: Sale of Los Angeles Veteran’s Property May Be Blocked

Posted by Kevin Norte at 7:15 pm .
Filed under: National Politics, California Politics
The following is a biased slanted opinion piece that poses that it is an unbiased article and it is misleading. I am just putting it out there to let the readers know what Disabled Veterans in the Country are up against.
And yes, I can be biased because this is a blog and I am a blogger who believes in supporting our troops and veterans.
The article fails to point out that it is only a bill and not law yet. 
Supporters of our troops and veterans must call their representatives and urge pasage of the bill with the protections for veterans.

Imagine what 269 acres of land in down town Los Angeles is worth. The Veterans Administration has, and figured its worth about 5 billion dollars–which they could devote to upgrading the West LA VA Medical Center which has a thousand beds and serves 322,000 enrolled veterans. California Senator Dianne Feinstein disagrees with their thinking, and Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) disagrees with Feinstein.In 2002, the VA initiated a review of all its properties as part of the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES), to determine where money could be saved and facilities improved. Eighteen properties were identified in 2004 for additional analysis, among them the West LA Center. 

   

According to CAGW, the CARES report identified 21 abandoned or underutilized buildings, out of 91 on the campus, that the VA says it has no use for, which could be turned into valuable resources. Also in the mix is the impending reorganization and modernization of the West LA medical facilities and the VA looked at the leasing of land as a way to help pay for it.

The CARES Stage Two Report on the property that came out August 24 notes that: “It is likely that reuse proceeds will provide a substantial offset to the significant capital investments required to render facilities modern, safe, and secure. It is prudent to maximize the potential value of vacant buildings and underutilized land to increase resources available to meet future veterans healthcare needs. Compatible development options that reduce underutilized portions of the campus have the potential to generate resources to provide additional services and/or pay for improvements to VA owned facilities.”

Seemed like a good idea at the time, until Feinstein inserted a provision into the 2008 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Act to put the kibosh on on the plan. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), tried to add an amendment that would have undercut Feinstein’s prohibition of commercialization. On September 5, the Senate rejected the amendment 66-25, and Feinstein carried the day.

The West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs campus sits on 388 acres on both sides of Wilshire Boulevard, west of Interstate 405. The land was deeded to the federal government in 1888 for the exclusive use of veterans. Apparently, the VA has a different opinion about what “exclusive use” means, as it has allowed various private uses of the land, including leases for Enterprise Rental Car and Fox Entertainment Group.

Feinstein?s provision does several things. It prohibits the Department of Veterans Affairs from issuing enhanced-use lease agreements on the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs property; expands the scope of the Cranston Act to cover all 388 acres of the site. The Act currently prohibits the sale of 109 acres, or roughly 29 percent of the site; and prohibits the Department of Veterans Affairs from exchanging, trading, auctioning or transferring any of the West Los Angeles VA land.

When it was deeded in 1888, following the Civil War, by two families to the federal government, the land was intended to be used specifically and permanently as an old soldiers? home, for the use of veterans. (Currently, California has over 2 million veterans).

With the number of disabled and elderly veterans growing at the end of the Civil War, the government responded by creating national homes throughout the U.S., akin to the Veterans Home in Yountville.

In March 1888, Senator John P. Jones and Arcadia B. de Baker donated their Santa Monica ranch lands in Southern California to establish the Pacific Branch of the National Homes for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers. The deed reads very specifically: “That whereas by an act of Congress approved March 2nd 1887 to provide for the location and erection of a branch home for the disabled volunteers soldiers West of the Rocky Mountains, the Board of Managers of the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers were authorized, empowered, and directed to locate, establish, construct and permanently maintain a branch of said National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.”

But it’s a lot of land in an tight market. In 1996, a 65,000-seat NFL Football stadium was proposed for the open space on the West LA VA until Congress stepped in and passed a resolution to prohibit it. The intent of the original deed was reiterated again in 2002 by then Veterans Affairs Secretary Anthony Principi when he visited the site, and again, when he issued a May 2004 decision regarding plans for the modernization of VA facilities elsewhere.

“What has happened here,” Feinstein said on the Senate floor before the vote, “is the Administration sees this land, dedicated to veterans, and says, ?Aha! There is a higher and better use for this land. We can make $4 billion if we lease out the unbuilt-upon part of this land.? And that?s what they have done, under the radar screen.

“Now, this is veterans land,” she continued. “This is land that was deeded to veterans. To be used by veterans. Not to be used by Fox movies. Not to be used by automobile rentals (both of which have current use leases). And the Administration admits that if they do this they can raise $4 billion in commercial rentals from this land, thereby taking this hospital, now in its park-like setting, and encrusting it with high-rise buildings along Wilshire Boulevard.”

According to Feinstein, the veterans community in LA is against the commercialization, as well as the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa, the entire city council, State senators and Assembly persons, and neighbors surrounding the property who are already overwhelmed by traffic problems. Even the LA Time editorialized against it.

But CAGW has a different take on the matter, stating, “Sen. Feinstein wants to take away these additional sources of revenue and force taxpayers to continue to pay for the continued maintenance and liability of the excess property. The VA’s hands will be tied, the buildings will continue to languish, and funding for medical center improvements will have to be redirected from somewhere else.

According toe CAGW, Critics have speculated that Sen. Feinstein is going to bat for wealthy constituents concerned that development on the land would ruin the views from their homes and hurt property values. The VA center is surrounded by the ritzy towns of Beverly Hills, Brentwood, and Bel-Air, home to many celebrities and country clubs–and no doubt a prime source of funding for Feinstein’s campaign chest.

“Whatever the motivation,” said a CAGW spokesperson, “the outcome of Sen. Feinstein’s plan would be harmful to veterans. For attempting to stymie the VA’s ability to cut waste and increase funding for improved veterans care at a time when our service men and women need it the most.”

From current leases, the West LA Veterans Administration recoups about $5 million dollars. There was no mention whether those leases would be rescinded. And the VA has to go back to the drawing board to find the money to modernize the facilities on the huge site.

Feinstein fights criticism of stand

against selling VA real estate

Thursday, September 20, 2007

October 10, 2007

Log Cabin Republicans versus Mitt Romeny, Round Two

Posted by Kevin Norte at 11:23 am .
Filed under: National Politics, Gay Rights, Log Cabin News

Help Keep the Momentum Going!

Our TV ad campaign highlighting Mitt Romney’s record is gaining momentum.  Please help us keep Governor Romney on the defensive.   On Sunday, Tim Russert showed the ad and discussed it on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”  (Watch the YouTube video.)  It has also been featured on MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews” and CNN’s “The Situation Room” with Wolf Blitzer!  

And today’s Washington Times had a front page article about our ad campaign.

Even though Mitt Romney showed up 20 years late to the Reagan Revolution, he’s trying to evoke Ronald Reagan’s name to sell his “conservative” image.   In last night’s GOP presidential debate, Mitt Romney said the Republican nominee should “come out of the same mold as Ronald Reagan.”

Too bad Mitt Romney doesn’t come out of Reagan’s mold.  As our ad points out,  Romney distanced himself from President Reagan during  his Senate campaign!  Romney emphatically told voters, “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush.  I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”

President Ronald Reagan once said, “Facts are stubborn things.”  The Romney campaign wants to ignore the fact that Mitt Romney is not a Reagan Republican.   Help us keep the heat on Gov. Romney. He’s trying to change the subject rather than explain why he ran from Ronald Reagan at a time when nearly all members of the GOP proudly described ourselves as Reagan Republicans.
 
We need your help NOW to educate Republicans about the real Romney. 

Visit logcabin.org for all the latest news and to watch the ad.


LOG CABIN NEEDS YOUR HELP.  CLICK HERE!

Log Cabin’s television ad campaign has the attention of newspapers, television reporters, and bloggers across the country.  It’s clear that this ad is having an impact.  Read what others are saying about the ad.

A Brief History In Time: LCR in San Francisco

Posted by Kevin Norte at 9:57 am .
Filed under: Log Cabin Chapters

Log Cabin Club of San Francisco/

Concerned Republicans for Individual Rights:

A Brief History: August 2, 1977 - Present (By Christoper L. Bowman [12/06/02])

     The Log Cabin Club of San Francisco/Concerned Republicans for Individual Rights is the oldest predominantly LGBT Republican volunteer organization in the nation. 
        In the mid-1970’s, there was a flowering of the Gay Community in San Francisco and new organizations were forming overnight, such as the Bay Area Physicians for Human Rights, Golden Gate Business Association, the Gay Men’s Chorus, and the Lesbian/Gay Freedom Day Marching Band.  Politically, there were three Gay Democratic clubs – Stonewall, Milk, and Alice which spoke to the interests of liberals and progressives in the Community, but not to the emerging population of moderates and conservatives coming out of the closet.

        At the same time, the San Francisco Republican Party had suffered major losses of registration and at the polls, and both the Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan factions of the Party saw the need to reach out to the Gay Community of San Francisco in the belief that many of its members (who were well-educated, success-ful business and professional persons, and homeowners and taxpayers) shared common values with the Republican Party.
        These two forces came together on August 2, 1977, in the living room of Bob and Bertha Nelson and Concerned Republicans for Individual Rights (CRIR) was formed.  Seated around the table were the Nelsons, John Molinari, Lee Dolson, Mike and Cathy Henderson, Sue Woods, Tom Isenberg and his lover Don James (who became the club’s first Secretary/ Treasurer and President, respectively) , and several other Gay Republicans.*  The club started tabling at 18th and Castro, and within a month, its membership had grown to 30.  On September 26, 1977, the club was chartered by the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee. 
 

 Critical to the success of the club over the past twenty-five years has been the active participation of several non-Gay members on its Board of Directors, including:  Mike and Kathy Henderson, Leanne Guth, Dominica Leong, James Bourgart, Barbara Chiodo, and former Supervisor Lee S. Dolson, Jr.
             Also, essential to the character of the club was the recognition from the very beginning that among CRIR’s Gay members, some were Gays who happened to be Republican, others were Republicans who happened to be Gay, and still others valued equally the fact that they were Gay and were Republican.  To address the needs of these members, the club developed the dual role of educating Republican candidates, office-holders, and party leaders about what it means to be a Gay Republican and to become sensitive about issues of concern to Gay people, and to act as a voice of moderation within both the Gay Community and San Francisco politics.   In addition to its political work, the club over the years has raised thousands of dollars for charities within the Community.
             Originally, the club met at members’ homes, but when that proved impracticable because of the increased number of people attending, CRIR moved its meetings to the Metropolitan Community Church on Eureka Street.  (Since 1981, the club has met in various bars and restaurants in the downtown area, the German Oak Restaurant in the Castro, the Urban Life Center of St. Marks Lutheran Church, and now at the LGBT Community Center on Market Street
        During its first year, CRIR worked primarily to defeat the anti-Gay Briggs’ Initiative (which would have banned gay teachers, counselors, administrators and staff from the public schools).  The club was successful in raising money to defeat the measure as well as helping to convince former Governor Reagan and Attorney General George Deukmejian to oppose Prop. 6 before many Democrats joined the No on 6 bandwagon.  The statewide No on 6 campaign believed that Reagan’s well publicized opposition was instrumental to the measure’s defeat.
             Between 1979 and 1982, the club grew by leaps and bounds, and in 1982 had 188 paid members, even surpassing the membership of the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club.  Essential to the CRIR’s growth were two remarkably talented Presidents, Kevin Wadsworth Johnson (1980) and Duke Armstrong (1980-1982). 
            Wadsworth, a former Executive Assistant to U.S. Senator Edward Gurney (R-Fla.) and an Administrative Assistant to the Mayor and City Council of Orlando, Florida, before he was “outed”, moved to San Francisco in the mid-1970’s.  He had a knack of putting together successful fundraisers, taking political risks, and mobilizing volunteers for various political campaigns.* Under his leadership, in 1980, the club was successful in electing four of its Gay members (Kevin Wadsworth, Don Bowden, Gary Myerscough, and Frank Crosetti) to the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee.** 
            Armstrong, who received his Law Degree from U.C. Davis (where he served on the student council)  was a political conservative, but a strong civil libertarian and a member of San Francisco’s Leather Community.  He put together well-attended membership meetings featuring leading political figures in the City and the State, and he and his lover Alphonso Sloop published an outstanding monthly newsletter, the San Francisco Mandate – probably the best in the San Francisco Gay Community at the time.
             In 1981, Armstrong, in conjunction with Kevin Wadsworth, Bruce Decker, and Leonard Matlovich, formed Foundation Cornerstone (a non-profit educational organization to combat the Religious Right), and CRIR successfully campaigned in the Castro to overturn the Burton gerrymanders which split San Francisco’s Gay Community down the middle.
             During his watch as President in 1983, Richmond District attorney Bob Bacci who served as the Secretary of the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee, shifted the club’s focus to statewide concerns — lobbying Republican legislators on AB-1 (the Gay Rights Bill), hate crimes legislation (AB-848), and AIDS legislation and funding.  In addition to State Senator Milton Marks (who was a lifetime Republican until his becoming a Democrat in 1986), the club counted among its Republican friends in Sacramento State Senators Ken Maddy, Bob Beverly, Ed Davis, Rebecca Morgan, and Tom Campbell, and Assemblyman Bill Filante.

       Filante was the 41st vote to support AB-1 in 1983 and became a champion for the LGBT Community on the AIDS front (both as a member of the California AIDS Advisory Committee and as Chairman of the California Republican Party’s Health Committee).   Ed Davis (who had the reputation of being anti-Gay when he was Chief of the LAPD) gave a stirring speech in favor of AB-1 in 1984 and by so doing helped win its passage in the State Senate.  Davis also was Bill Dannemeyer’s worst nightmare during the primary campaign for United States Senate in 1986.  
 
            In 1984, with banker Tom Peretti at the helm, in coalition with other local community groups such as the Golden Gate Business Association, Bay Area Physicians for Human Rights, and S.F. AIDS Foundation, CRIR helped form the San Francisco Community Partnership on AIDS.  Peretti also had the misfortune of presiding over the club when Governor Deukmejian vetoed AB-1.  Four members of CRIR’s board resigned in protest of the veto, but Peretti kept the club together and moving forward.
             During the Presidency of Christopher L. Bowman (1985-1986), CRIR provided moral and material support for the ARC/AIDS vigil at U.N. Plaza, was one of the three original founders of the LIFE/AIDS Lobby in Sacramento, and with the help of Barbara Chiodo (who was president of the California Republican Assembly at the time and later became the President of LCCSF and Log Cabin California) and the help of CRIR’s counterparts from Southern California was instrumental in successfully lobbying the California Republican Party to oppose Proposition 64 (the LaRouche AIDS/ Quarantine Initiative).  The club also raised $3,600 to defeat the measure at a fundraiser organized by Robert Speer with Congressman Ed Zschau.
             Under the leadership of CRIR President Brian Mavrogeorge (1986-1988), the club, in concert with its sister organizations from Los Angeles, Orange County, and San Diego, formed Log Cabin California.  Marty Keller (who had served as an officer of CRIR, was elected in 1988 to the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee, served as Co-Chair of the LIFE/AIDS Lobby in 1991, and was an administrator of the State Department of Consumer Affairs under Governor Pete Wilson from 1991-1999) served as Log Cabin California’s first President. 
               During the second “March to Washington” in October, 1987, Log Cabin California planted the seeds of what would ultimately become Log Cabin Republicans (which currently has over 30 chapters nationally and has a lobbying office in Washington, D.C., ably led by Rich Tafel for nearly a decade).  In 1989, CRIR merged with the other clubs of the State and changed its name to the Log Cabin Club of San Francisco/
Concerned Republicans for Individual Rights.
             Also in 1987, closer to home, CRIR, as part of a broad-based coalition of the various Republican volunteer clubs of San Francisco (including the California Chinese American Republican Association; Lincoln Club of Northern California – San Francisco Chapter; Lyn Nofziger Republican Assembly; Nob Hill Republican Women, Federated; San Francisco Chapter of the California Republican League; San Francisco Republican Women, Federated; and the San Francisco Young Republicans), helped form Citizens for a Better San Francisco which put together a “big-tent” slate of Republican volunteers to rejuvenate the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee.  28 of the 29 members of the slate were elected in June, 1988.  CBSF-backed candidates have dominated the Central Committee ever since.
             In 1990, Ron Kershaw (1988-1990) — who served as President of LCCSF for two terms and succeeded Marty Keller as President of Log Cabin California — and other Log Cabin members on the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee successfully lobbied their colleagues on the Committee to support the new and improved Domestic Partners proposal on the ballot and the measure won at the polls.  (In 1989, a similar measure which had not been endorsed by the SFGOP, lost narrowly.) 
             1991 was the best of years and the worse of years.  Pete Wilson was sworn in as Governor in the anticipation by many that he would work with the Gay Community and Log Cabin to fashion a Gay Rights bill that he could sign.  He also appointed a number of up-front Gay Republicans including Marty Keller and Frank Ricchiazzi and political moderates such as Kim Belshe, Curt Augustine, Alexa Vuksich, and Tina Frank to his administration.  At the end of September 1991, however, Wilson vetoed AB-101, igniting a firestorm of protests and riots in the Gay Community directed against Wilson and Republicans in general and against Gay Republicans in particular.  Members of Queer Nation hounded Log Cabin members in the Castro yelling “Burn the Log Cabin”.  It was in the midst of this maelstrom that Assemblyman Bill Filante drove from Sacramento on a Monday afternoon to the Castro office of realtor Robert Speer (LCCSF’s President) to keep the club from disbanding and to refocus its efforts to pass yet another Gay Rights measure in 1992. 
             The next year, when Barbara Chiodo presided over the club, Filante co-sponsored AB-2601 (which amended the Labor Code to investigate and resolve employment discrimination cases based on sexual orientation), and that fall, the Governor signed the bill.  Unfortunately, Bill Filante never saw the law take effect as he died tragically of a brain tumor that December.  As an aside, Paul Lynd, who served as the Vice Chairman of Log Cabin California under Chiodo, became the first administrator of the new law in 1993.
             In 1993, on behalf of the club, under the leadership of Ted Turrell, Chris Bowman worked with the
 Campaign for Military Justice both locally and in Washington, D.C. in an effort to lift the ban on Lesbians
and Gays serving in the Military. 
                  After the National Office of LCR opened in the Fall of 1993, the club’s focus returned to the arenas of San Francisco politics and the battle for the soul of California Republican Party.  Much of LCCSF’s activities centered around the screening and interviewing of candidates for local partisan and non-partisan office and proponents and opponents of local ballot measures, and working closely with former Assembly-man Brooks Firestone and his “Big Tent” coalition to bring the California Republican Party back to the political center.  In that capacity, club President Mike German in 1999 and 2000 successfully lobbied the California Republican Party to delete anti-Gay rhetoric from the State Party Platform dealing with AIDS. 
                    In the electoral arena, the club was instrumental in opposing the politicization of the judiciary by
helping to defeat an effort by a former Chairman of the San Francisco Democratic Party to be elected to the San Francisco Superior Court and by helping to successfully thwart challenges to California Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin, and San Francisco Superior Court Judges Kevin Ryan, David Ballati, Wallace Douglass, and Dorothy Von Beroldingen in 1998.  Since then, no local incumbent judge has been challenged.
              Not every activity of Log Cabin has been strictly political.  The club has held a number of annual dinners.  It’s keynote speakers have included Assembly Minority Leader Bob Naylor, Assemblyman Bill Filante, State Senator Ed Davis, U.S. Senator Pete Wilson, Congressman Tom Campbell (several times), Treasurers Tom Hayes and Matt Fong, State Senator Quentin Kopp, California Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin, Congressman Jim Kolbe, and Journalist Debra Saunders.
                Additionally, the club has raised over the years nearly $15,000 for various charitable causes.
                In September, 1982, at a cabaret benefit, the club raised $2,200 for the Kaposi Sarcoma Foundation (the predecessor of the S.F. AIDS Foundation) so they could furnish its three room office on Castro Street.  Subsequently, the club raised another $11,000 for the AIDS Emergency Fund through three Mr. Financial District contests.  Most recently, the club raised $620 for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.
             In conclusion, the club has witnessed a number of successes over the years as well as several setbacks such as Governor Deukmejian’s and Wilson’s vetoes of AB-1 and AB-101, the take-over of the California Republican Party by Religious Right extremists in 1991, the Houston Convention of 1992, and the ongoing AIDS pandemic, but it has proved to be resilient, time and again, because of the loyalty of its members, the support of its coalition partners within the San Francisco and California Republican Parties, and strong and effective club leadership.
           
            For a quarter of a century, LCCSF/CRIR has been blessed with a succession of seventeen truly gifted Presidents, including Don James, David Finn, Kevin Wadsworth Johnson, Duke Armstrong, Bob Bacci, Tom Peretti, Chris Bowman, Brian Mavrogeorge, Ron Kershaw, Robert Speer, Barbara Chiodo, Ted Turrell, Steve Fong, Scott Furman, Mike German, Randy Bernard, and Colin Gallagher, and over three dozen club members who have served as Officers and Directors of the Board.
 
            *  Several Gay members of LCCSF/CRIR have run for elective office in San Francisco, including Kevin Wadsworth for District 5 Supervisor in 1979, City-wide Supervisor in 1980, and U.S. Congress in 1987; Bob Bacci for Community College Board in 1982 and for the Republican Nomination for the 19th Assembly in 1984; Brian Mavrogeorge for the 16th Assembly in 1988; Ronald G. Kershaw for the Assessor in 1990; Randall Bernard for the 13th Assembly in 1998; and G. Michael German for the 8th Congressional District in 2002. 
 

** Other Gay members of LCCSF/CRIR elected to the San Francisco Republican County Central Committee have included:  Bob Bacci, Christopher L. Bowman, Marty Keller, Brian Mavrogeorge, Ron Kershaw, Ted Turrell, Randall Bernard, G. Michael German, and Joel Springer, III.

But Was It Genocide in Armenia?

Posted by Kevin Norte at 9:13 am .
Filed under: National Politics

I believe the words speak for themselves.  However Turkey’s position makes it easier for Germany and France to deny Turkey’s admission into the European Union and hence no “Euros” in Turkey.  Once again, bigotry and hatred halts progress.  I am sorry for my Armenian friends, truly, I am and sorry for America, again. 

GEORGE BUSH-1990 

April 20, 1990 — Armenian Remembrance Day

Throughout this century, the United States has had a special, enduring relationship with the Armenian people. Armenians around the world share with their friends in the United States a love of freedom, and as proud people they have a strong commitment to the preservation of their heritage and culture.

Their history, though marked by a number of tragedies, nonetheless reflects their faith and the strength and resilience of their tradition. Those tragedies include the Earthquake of 1988 and, most prominently, the terrible massacres suffered in 1915-1923 at the hands of the rulers of the Ottoman Empire.

The United States responded to the victims of the crime against humanity by leading international diplomatic and private relief efforts.

The Armenian-American community now numbers nearly one million people. Those who emigrated to the United States, and their descendants, continue to make significant contributions to the betterment of our country in many fields of endeavor.

On this seventy-fifth anniversary of the massacres, I wish to join with Armenians and all peoples in observing April 24, 1990 as a day of remembrance for the more than a million Armenian people who were victims. I call upon all peoples to work to prevent future acts of inhumanity against mankind, and my comments of June 1988 represent the depth of my feeling for the Armenian people and the sufferings they have endured.

George Bush  

GEORGE W. BUSH-2007 

October 10, 2007

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Bush administration Wednesday lobbied heavily against a House resolution that labels the killings of Armenians in Turkey during World War I as “genocide,” saying it would hurt relations with a key U.S. ally. 

“We recognize the feelings of those who want to express their concern and their disdain for what happened many years ago,” Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said outside the White House. “But the passage of this resolution at this time would, indeed, be very problematic for everything that we’re trying to do in the Middle East because we are very dependent on a good Turkish strategic ally to help with our efforts.” 

The nonbinding proposal, which is to be considered by the House Foreign Affairs Committee, acknowledges the “genocide” of Armenians in the early 20th century during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, which preceded the creation of modern Turkey in 1923. 

“In the case that Armenian allegations are accepted, there will be serious problems in the relations between the two countries,” said President Abdullah Gul in a letter to President Bush, who staunchly opposes the resolution. 

Nabi Sensoy, Turkey’s ambassador to the United States, told CNN the resolution’s passage would be a “very injurious move to the psyche of the Turkish people.” 

He predicted a “backlash” in the country, saying there will be setbacks on several fronts: Turkish-American relations, Turkish-Armenian relations and the normalization of relations between the nations of Turkey and Armenia. 

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said good relations with Turkey are vital because 70 percent of the air cargo intended for and 30 percent of the fuel consumed by the U.S. forces in Iraq flies through Turkey. 

U.S. commanders, Gates said, “believe clearly that access to airfields and roads and so on in Turkey would very much be put at risk if this resolution passes and the Turks react as strongly as we believe they will.” 

“Our heavy dependence on the Turks for access is really the reason the commanders raised this and why we’re so concerned about the resolution,” Gates said. 

The resolution, which has much support in the full House, is “calling upon the president (Bush) to ensure that the foreign policy of the United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing and genocide documented in the United States record relating to the Armenian genocide, and for other purposes.” 

A similar resolution passed the committee two years ago 40-7, but it never reached the full House floor. 

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, the resolution’s author and sponsor refers to “the systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000 Armenians as genocide.” 

The term genocide is defined in dictionary.com as “the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.” 

But this opinion is hotly disputed in Turkey, the predominantly Muslim, but modern and secular, pro-Western ally of the United States. 

Turks argue that all peoples — Armenians and Turks — suffered during the warfare. But Armenians maintain there was an organized genocide by the Ottoman Turkish authorities, and have been campaigning across the world for official recognition of the genocide. 

The resolution arrives at a particularly sensitive juncture in U.S.-Turkish relations. The United States has urged Turkey not to send its troops over the border into northern Iraq to fight Kurdish separatist rebels, who have launched some cross-border attacks against Turkish targets. 

Observers of U.S.-Turkish relations have argued such a House resolution could make Turkey less inclined to use restraint in dealing with its longstanding problems with the Kurdistan Workers Party, known as the PKK. 

Schiff, who represents a southern California district with many Armenian-Americans, said the “bipartisan measure currently has 226 cosponsors, more than a majority in the House and the most support an Armenian genocide resolution has ever received.” 

“The United States has a compelling historical and moral reason to recognize the Armenian genocide, which cost a million and a half people their lives,” said Schiff. “But we also have a powerful contemporary reason as well. How can we take effective action against the genocide in Darfur if we lack the will to condemn genocide whenever and wherever it occurs?” 

That is a reference to the violent conflict in the Sudanese region of Darfur. 

 

October 9, 2007

Schwarzenegger Signs Bills To Benefit Veterans

Posted by Kevin Norte at 8:25 pm .
Filed under: National Politics, California Politics

Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Bills to Benefit Veterans, Military Personnel in California

Governor Schwarzenegger today announced that he has signed legislation that will benefit California veterans, military personnel and their families.   One proposal provides important protections against predatory lenders; another one requires employers to allow the spouse of a service member, when he or she is on leave, to take up to 10 days of unpaid leave.  Also included are bills that expand educational opportunities, waive certain vehicle fees, make voting easier, increase access to state retirement benefits and make it a crime to misrepresent a military medal.

“These bills demonstrate California’s commitment to those who currently serve, those who have served and the families who have sacrificed so much to support them,” said Governor Schwarzenegger. “Our military community deserves strong consumer protections, continued educational opportunities and as much support as we can give their families.”


The following bills have been signed into law:

AB 7 by Assemblymember Ted Lieu (D-Torrance): Provides armed service members and their families a number of consumer credit services protections against predatory and deceptive lending practices and unlawful financial and investment schemes and allows California to enforce federal law.

 

AB 392  by Assemblymember Ted Lieu (D-Torrance): Requires employers to allow the husband or wife of a soldier serving to take up to 10 days of unpaid leave while their husband or wife is home on leave.

 

AB 1528 by Committee on Banking and Finance: Prohibits false and deceptive marketing of financial services or products to service members, veterans and their families.

 

AB 282 by Assemblymember Paul Cook (R-Yucca Valley): Makes it a crime for any person to falsely represent himself/herself to have been awarded any military decoration or medal with the intent to defraud.

 

AB 223 by Assemblymember Sharon Runner (R-Lancaster): Allows a person called for military service after the absentee ballot application deadline to vote absentee by fax.

 

AB 950 by Assemblymember Mary Salas (D-Chula Vista): Extends the period of time in which non-California members of the Armed Forces are entitled to pay the lower in-state fees at California State University and the University of California.

 

SB 14 by Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod (D-Montclair): Allows members of the California National Guard to qualify for membership in the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), and to purchase additional PERS service credit.

 

SB 272 by Senator George Runner (R-Antelope Valley): Gives members of the armed services priority enrollment for California State University and California Community Colleges classes and requests the University of California to do the same.

 

SB 386 by Senator Dave Cogdill (R-Modesto): Waives various fees on vehicles owned by the surviving spouse of a former prisoner of war (POW) or Congressional Medal of Honor recipient and allows the family to keep a special interest license plate as a remembrance of the deceased.

October 8, 2007

Something to Think About

Posted by Mark Martin at 12:24 pm .
Filed under: National Politics, Gay Rights

 Next year, as the Presidential elections move into full swing, we are all faced with the realization that some of our own personal and community issues may be eclipsed by other issues that have direct impact not only upon the GLBT Community, but upon the safety and security of all U.S. Citizens.  To many of us, our National Security comes to the forefront as a primary concern, especially as we are faced with global terrorism and the desire of some radicals to conquer all free nations of the world.  This is why it is very important for all of us to closely follow the coming elections and elect only those individuals who want to secure our borders; who refuse to pander to those nations whose radical individuals wish to usurp our nation’s economy; those candidates who will defend our safety and our general well-being and who are totally dedicated to protecting and defending our nation’s freedom for all of its citizens.

All too often, we tend to forget that the GLBT community in the United States has come a long way in attaining the freedoms that we have today.  Yes, we fought through the bigotry and intolerance of those who styled themselves to be “good people” of the “religious right;” now, those good people of the “religious right” are facing the hatred and intolerance that they once directed at ourselves, but in a much more violent and potentially more dangerous manner.

The intolerance we have experienced by the “religious right” is a drop in the bucket compared to what members of the GLBT community are facing around the world at the hands of Islamic fundamentalism.  Hence, I am posting the following article that was written on Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007 by Robert Spencer, in “FrontPageMag.com,” a fairly conservative publication. Entitled “Islamic Bigotry: the Slaughter of 4000 Gays,” this sobering article all too clearly reveals the hypocrisy, the hatred and intolerance of those who want to do all of us harm, not only to members of the GLBT Community, but to all those who do not believe as they do. More... The full article may be found at: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=FBC2142D-4A38-4B4C-9C0B-4B0AA4CF3822I am posting it here in case you have difficulties accessing the Front Page website:

Islamic Bigotry: The Slaughter of 4,000 Gays
 

By Robert Spencer
FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, October 02, 2007
 

At Columbia University on Monday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared: “We don’t have homosexuals like in your country. We don’t have that in our country. We don’t have this phenomenon; I don’t know who’s told you we have it.”
 
If there were any truth to this – and there is none – it would be because the Islamic regime in Iran had killed them, since homosexuality can be a capital crime in that country. One notorious case occurred on July 19, 2005, when two teenage boys, Mahmoud Asgari, 14, and Ayaz Marhoni, 16, were hanged in a particularly brutal manner in Iran for the crime of homosexual activity. Although Iranian officials insisted that the death sentence was for the rape of a third boy, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, has said otherwise. But Asgari and Marhoni were not alone. According to the Iranian gay and lesbian rights group Homan, the Iranian government has put to death an estimated 4,000 homosexuals since 1980. According to Scott Long, director of the Human Rights Watch Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program, Iranians who are suspected of being gay commonly face torture. Hossein Alizadeh of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission said Iran gays live with “constant fear of execution and persecution and also social stigma associated with homosexuality.”
 
This is true not only in Iran, but in all too many areas of the Islamic world. The Qur’an characterizes those who “practice your lusts on men in preference to women” as “transgressing beyond bounds” (7:81). A hadith pronounces “the curse of Allah” upon those who engage in homosexual activity. A contemporary Muslim writer, Shaykh Abdul-Azeez Al-Fawzaan, called homosexuality “one of the most sinful acts known to humankind” and said that it was “evidence of perverted instincts, total collapse of shame and honor, and extreme filthiness of character and soul.”
 
Legal views on punishment vary. Among the Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence (madhahib), the Hanafi school mandates a severe beating for the first offense, and the death penalty for a repeat offender. The Shafi’i school calls for 100 lashes for an unmarried homosexual, death by stoning for a married one. The Hanbali school requires stoning across the board. Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, directed his followers to “kill the one who sodomizes and the one who lets it be done to him” (‘Umdat al-Salik, p17.3).
In many areas these injunctions are still followed. The Islamic Penal Law Against Homosexuals in Iran calls for the death penalty for sodomy and one hundred lashes for lesbianism for the first three offenses, with death for the fourth offense. Homosexuality is a capital offense not only in Iran, but also in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen and Mauritania. In Malaysia, it can draw a twenty-year prison sentence, and is illegal also in Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, the United Arab Emirates, and Uzbekistan, among others.
 
Of course, Afghanistan under the Taliban regime drew international attention for killing gays by toppling walls onto them. Pakistani law mandates two years in prison for homosexual activity, but the traditional Islamic penalties of lashing and stoning are still widely popular. When authorities in the United Arab Emirates arrested twenty-six men whom they accused of participating in a mass gay wedding – with twelve dressed as grooms and twelve as brides, plus a disc jockey and a man who was to perform the wedding ceremony – in November 2005, they announced plans to subject the men not only to lashings and jail time, but also to hormone treatments.
 
In light of all this, the silence of campus gay rights groups and the so-called “progressive” Left generally about the global efforts by Islamic jihadists to impose Islamic Sharia law is appallingly short-sighted. While they attack Christians, who are not calling for gays to be imprisoned or killed under any circumstances, they say nothing about a genuine threat to their survival. While they attack Israel, a gay-friendly country, they are silent about the murder of gays in Islamic Iran. 
 
The late columnist Cathy Seipp recounted a telling incident in March 2006, when a friend of hers went into San Francisco’s City Lights bookstore and asked for a copy of the late and much-missed Oriana Fallaci’s The Force of Reason. “We don’t carry books by fascists,” sniffed the clerk, prompting Seipp to muse: “Strangest of all is the scenario of such a person disliking an author for defending Western civilization against radical Islam — when one of the first things those poor, persecuted Islamists would do, if they ever (Allah forbid) came to power in the U.S., is crush suspected homosexuals like him beneath walls.”

October 4, 2007

Romeny Campaign Responds To Log Cabn Republicans (click on these terms for a better view)

Posted by Kevin Norte at 11:20 pm .
Filed under: National Politics, Gay Rights

Update! Romney Campaign Responds to Log Cabin Ad

Click here for the Romney Campaign’s response to our ad. 

You’ll notice his campaign is trying to attack Log Cabin rather than address the Governor’s huge credibility problem.  His response ignores the point of the ad.  He has flip-flopped on almost every major issue: taxes, immigration, education, gay rights, gun ownership, stem cell research, campaign finance reform, and other issues.  It’s a matter of trust.  Quite frankly, instead of a 30-second ad, we could have done a 30-minute infomercial on all his flip-flops.  No one knows what Mitt Romney really believes.

And you’ll love that Romney’s campaign even mentioned Ronald Reagan in his response to our ad.  That’s a surprise considering what Romney himself said about Reagan: “I was independent during the time of Reagan-Bush.  I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”  This just shows that Mitt Romney will say whatever he thinks people want to hear.  Read more.

Mitt Romney has spent millions of dollars on TV ads painting himself as a conservative.  Republicans deserve to know his entire record.

The Trouble With Mitt (click on these terms for a better view)

Posted by Kevin Norte at 10:17 am .
Filed under: National Politics, Gay Rights

REAL CLEAR POLITICS

Log Cabin Republican’s AD Regarding Mitt Romeny

RYAN J. DAVIS:A Gay Defends Mitt

Mitt Romney’s Official MYSPACE Page

Anne Romney’s Offical MYSPACE Page

Tagg Romeny’s Official MYSPACE page

Matt Romeny’s Official MYSPACE Page

Josh Romney’s Offical MYSPACE Page

Craig Romney’s Official MYSPACE Page

Ben Romeny’s Official MYSPACE Page